Recently I have mentioned that mankind as it exists today is a kind of negative selection. Darwin and even his replacements were horribly wrong about the idea of the survival of the fittest. Human has, obviously synchronously with the switch from godly to the ungodly, turned everything around. It is constantly the best which are SORTED AWAY and eradicated. If we look at today's Near East, where especially there is a slaughtering of those people standing in for humanely civilization, e.g by protecting their girls from rape but also by belonging to more peaceful religious groups, or Iran which is sorting out people standing up against old haters, herein especially from the minority tribes whose cultural descend is far from such 'Old Bitter Men Tyranny' ideology, we have an idea of what the Roman Realm has done at the time of the Celts (and to all other civilizations they have broken up) and the Catholic Realm, actually similar stuff, to the intelligentsia of Europe and within their reach for ages. Add an Austrian with clearly social childhood problems with traumatic effects who got lost in mad ideas about an 'Aryan Breed' which is basically breeding a homogenous population on recessive Genes, and you know which type of human you deal with: People with horrible fears and suppressed selves who try to get back control over their own lives by hitting hard on or eliminating others whom they sense as an obstacle to their grandiosity phantasies.
The major misconception in such weaklings is the false belief that it is the STRONG to fear. I mentioned - it is not the strong to fear but the weak ones to fear. Only from the perspective of childhood, when the child is faced with an adult who initiates the pain, it looks like that one is strong.
An adult who is giving pain to a child for what reason ever, except for reasonable self-defense (that's what I learned from a Brazilian growing up in a Favela - life is not everywhere as still (!) halfway 'safe' civilizations), is WEAK. Not strong. But to understand this one would have to overcome childhood traumata, and the people eliminating just anything they fear for possible loss of their (self-) control, have NOT overcome. This is the crux.
When 'cultivated' and ritualized, such becomes a 'cultural' feature.
What they also all share is that these groups obviously had had no mothers who were able and ready to protect and shelter their very own children as nature has given as a very natural duty.
What we can see and watch today is history lessons pure.
Add to this the inbreed problem and a need to breed on less capable women for millenia by now.
The down-break of men from what they were meant to be, the victory of the mob over the natural leaders by social and physical skills results in coupling of those gammas with even lower females due to their minority complexes, logically despising and feeling fear in the presence of adult women - which results in turn in suppression and outcasting of naturally capable women, a typical example is the Catholic Church and the burning of so-called 'witches' - , which again results in even less capable offspring which is brought up in worse ways than would be good for personal health and evolution, and so on and so forth. Clearly an irony to what we as mankind were given as both natural but also cultural heritage.
Usually, and this is part of the scriptural heritage, it would be man and woman, or 'Ego' and Godly 'I', to 're-cognize' each other and bond and especially the man to LEAVE the parents, in the sense of growing out of the role of child of the family into a man, which means to LEAVE the implants behind himself and in a way being freed by choosing the love with a woman and bond with her for the sake of a new generation.
Anything else is keeping him, man, and with it us ALL, in the estate of fearful children.
An awesome analysis puts this effect together very interestingly:
Anyway, and also this I have been referring to before quite often, psychological violence and emotional abuse has at least the same effect strength as the physical form. Also have I mentioned somewhere once that this 'role' of the abusing mother, this not as a judgement but description because such systems always continue from one abuse to the other, can be taken or passed to another female relative - this can be a sister, too, herself needy and incapable of leading a good relation with her man, or even a daughter who has learned this kind of 'female' role behaviour within that family system. It's such a pity but the majority of men worldwide is in such traps and with them, the females. None will ascend or break out - until some one does, and that some one is most likely to be placed into the black sheep role.
Almost impossible. But necessary, if we want a tiny sense of human life down here. It is the key for lots of steps further on.
There are many derivations of psychological abuse and the major problem is that it is much more difficult to detect and especially to name and totally impossible to prove for the victims. All of them cause the syndrome described as 'Stockholm' and a constant recreation and repetition of the pain and hostage situation.
Thus it is just logical that my current fave tv format is 'Hatufim - Prisoners of War', an excellent Israeli work. It would be so helpful if we understand our selves as such, still or formerly (escapees though are only few) hostages, and we might understand maybe a lot more about ourselves no matter whether we are males or females - the abuse is always, as a result of false partnerships of the parents, over-generationally mutual until we realize and reject the pattern and break the code of conditioning.
Merda, forget that most have fled into camouflage mode by compensation and (yet) invisible depressions. Okay, those won't find out.
Human, by the way, I was wondering about some time before and as it looks the 'hu' in the term is related to the syllable for 'spiritual' which often is used as an equivalent for 'godly'.
While 'man' is clearly both hand (lat. manus) and man which means we are able to act with hands, the pre-Islamic deity 'Hubal' demonstrates this quite nicely as being the 'hu' of 'Baal' who in turn is a connection of the 'Ba' of 'Al'. Still I have not found an answer what is the 'wo' in wo-man though. Maybe the 'womb man'. Maybe just kidding.
What has all that got to do with Baboons? Well. Just watch their patriarchal and violent structures, their constant quarrels, their females being hit and in turn hitting their next for being closer to and favorized by the males in power, sexual submission of both sexes, the abuse of their own offspring for letting off steam and so on and so forth. Example of the mob in action, a nice behaviourist short study if you watch the body language of the apes:
Looks familiar? They are the closest with regard to all behaviour to how mankind shows itself these days. No matter whether in Near East, Far East, on the streets of major European Capitals or in Real time Business Life. In the latter, the mob just works more subtle.
Just - what about the 'hu' in 'man', the spirit (with-) in our hands?
Wondering,
Lyn
The major misconception in such weaklings is the false belief that it is the STRONG to fear. I mentioned - it is not the strong to fear but the weak ones to fear. Only from the perspective of childhood, when the child is faced with an adult who initiates the pain, it looks like that one is strong.
An adult who is giving pain to a child for what reason ever, except for reasonable self-defense (that's what I learned from a Brazilian growing up in a Favela - life is not everywhere as still (!) halfway 'safe' civilizations), is WEAK. Not strong. But to understand this one would have to overcome childhood traumata, and the people eliminating just anything they fear for possible loss of their (self-) control, have NOT overcome. This is the crux.
When 'cultivated' and ritualized, such becomes a 'cultural' feature.
What they also all share is that these groups obviously had had no mothers who were able and ready to protect and shelter their very own children as nature has given as a very natural duty.
What we can see and watch today is history lessons pure.
Add to this the inbreed problem and a need to breed on less capable women for millenia by now.
The down-break of men from what they were meant to be, the victory of the mob over the natural leaders by social and physical skills results in coupling of those gammas with even lower females due to their minority complexes, logically despising and feeling fear in the presence of adult women - which results in turn in suppression and outcasting of naturally capable women, a typical example is the Catholic Church and the burning of so-called 'witches' - , which again results in even less capable offspring which is brought up in worse ways than would be good for personal health and evolution, and so on and so forth. Clearly an irony to what we as mankind were given as both natural but also cultural heritage.
Usually, and this is part of the scriptural heritage, it would be man and woman, or 'Ego' and Godly 'I', to 're-cognize' each other and bond and especially the man to LEAVE the parents, in the sense of growing out of the role of child of the family into a man, which means to LEAVE the implants behind himself and in a way being freed by choosing the love with a woman and bond with her for the sake of a new generation.
Anything else is keeping him, man, and with it us ALL, in the estate of fearful children.
An awesome analysis puts this effect together very interestingly:
Where you have a devalued female and an over-idealized mother, as you do in Arab and Muslim culture and where there is a prohibition to separate from the mother, violent problems may ensue—such as murder-suicide.[...] This creates tremendous ambivalence, on the one hand to want to bond with mother (ummi) and on the other hand at the same time remaining terrified of her, resulting in a confusing sense of identity. Perhaps this is why Muslims struggle so and are always fighting to prove their identity.Nancy Hartevelt Kobrin interviewed on her Book 'The Banality of Suicide Terrorism: The Naked Truth About the Psychology of Islamic Suicide Bombing', found on newenglishreview.org
Anyway, and also this I have been referring to before quite often, psychological violence and emotional abuse has at least the same effect strength as the physical form. Also have I mentioned somewhere once that this 'role' of the abusing mother, this not as a judgement but description because such systems always continue from one abuse to the other, can be taken or passed to another female relative - this can be a sister, too, herself needy and incapable of leading a good relation with her man, or even a daughter who has learned this kind of 'female' role behaviour within that family system. It's such a pity but the majority of men worldwide is in such traps and with them, the females. None will ascend or break out - until some one does, and that some one is most likely to be placed into the black sheep role.
Almost impossible. But necessary, if we want a tiny sense of human life down here. It is the key for lots of steps further on.
There are many derivations of psychological abuse and the major problem is that it is much more difficult to detect and especially to name and totally impossible to prove for the victims. All of them cause the syndrome described as 'Stockholm' and a constant recreation and repetition of the pain and hostage situation.
Thus it is just logical that my current fave tv format is 'Hatufim - Prisoners of War', an excellent Israeli work. It would be so helpful if we understand our selves as such, still or formerly (escapees though are only few) hostages, and we might understand maybe a lot more about ourselves no matter whether we are males or females - the abuse is always, as a result of false partnerships of the parents, over-generationally mutual until we realize and reject the pattern and break the code of conditioning.
Merda, forget that most have fled into camouflage mode by compensation and (yet) invisible depressions. Okay, those won't find out.
Human, by the way, I was wondering about some time before and as it looks the 'hu' in the term is related to the syllable for 'spiritual' which often is used as an equivalent for 'godly'.
While 'man' is clearly both hand (lat. manus) and man which means we are able to act with hands, the pre-Islamic deity 'Hubal' demonstrates this quite nicely as being the 'hu' of 'Baal' who in turn is a connection of the 'Ba' of 'Al'. Still I have not found an answer what is the 'wo' in wo-man though. Maybe the 'womb man'. Maybe just kidding.
What has all that got to do with Baboons? Well. Just watch their patriarchal and violent structures, their constant quarrels, their females being hit and in turn hitting their next for being closer to and favorized by the males in power, sexual submission of both sexes, the abuse of their own offspring for letting off steam and so on and so forth. Example of the mob in action, a nice behaviourist short study if you watch the body language of the apes:
Looks familiar? They are the closest with regard to all behaviour to how mankind shows itself these days. No matter whether in Near East, Far East, on the streets of major European Capitals or in Real time Business Life. In the latter, the mob just works more subtle.
Just - what about the 'hu' in 'man', the spirit (with-) in our hands?
Wondering,
Lyn
