21 January 2014

By the Way ... Fragile. So Easy to Be Torn Around.

Just checking out this and that as I am a little 'on hold' these days and I appreciate it for my own re-organ-ization (ooops), found a clue by shere coincidence. Our old religions ... contain some truth but it is terribly tormented and torn and therefore difficult to find what is behind.

Starting point is the usual translation of bible(s) referring to 'the serpent' ... as equivalent to 'Satan', 'the devil' and some more. Seems all (or All) is simplified by throwing it into one big soup which honestly is an insult for any bi-brained being. Of course, Satan, Devil, the Dragon and the Serpent mean different entities or concepts.

Once upon the time in my life when I was tracking some stuff for quite a while in so-called shamanistic environment, the big cheese in that group, of whom I learned a lot about tracking, too, especially deepening some tools like remote-viewing and other stuff, got mad about that the bible is somewhat really weird like in some ancient myths writing about a serpent in the sea which is a little later in the text translated as 'a whale', then as a 'dragon' and so on. Of course such information is confusing ... either because the author(s) or translators were confused themselves or simply they wanted to create that confusion. A con-fusion, by the way.

The entry door though is lying in the fact that these scriptures are somehow a root connection to mankind and what we all, mankind, are and have inside as heritage. 


'Tech adorers' may find out one day that no linear technology is superior to such a long-term development as is humans' and its brains and minds. But it depends on what people make from their given gifts, and this is not much, even in times like this where we have so much access to information and knowledge as never before. But non-trained brains easily become overloaded and due to earlier conditioning, people simply refuse to process or even access given information.

By tradition - carrying it along in both senses, 'traduir' (translate) and trādere are not very far from one another, to the same group also belongs 'to trade' etymologically  - topics have messed up a little. Any communicator in the row additionally has added his influence - in here it's mainly definitely about male passers-on in a very rigid, male-dominated environment. It is like with the left hand-right hand relation: one would really hope that one day people might understand that none is nothing without the other.

Well then, what about the serpent? Isn't the serpent so neglected, aren't the kids of all ages (being)  filled with fear about? Fear is a very nice manipulation tool, anyway. Maybe the best as it works on our deepest levels most of us never may access.

Freud and consorts might dwell in some coca-inspired concept of female fear of the snake as a symbol for the male phallus. None of this.


There is an old 'goddess', long forgotten, named


SARPANIT.




There is not much to be found but as it looks, she was companion of Marduk. And companion respectively brother-sister-couples who even may marry usually refers to the splitting-up, analysis of whole things as you can see in any kind of godly genealogy. It is a way to explain elements of a whole but not meant for disconnecting them - more a kind of analytic thinking in pictures by personalizing the analyzed parts.

If it was so that 'she' could also be symbolized as a snake then we should remind ourselves of the knowledge that 'snake' is a healer, too. The 'snake' or serpent is mentioned in Genesis re-alizing the fruit of knowledge. And the serpent, the 'hissing one', is the one who, inside us, stretches out in a love act towards theupwards to (re_) unite with the Good which is 'a bove'. So torn, the knowledge and wisdoms of our ancestors and our past. The point is now that we have ALL this information inside us, and as soon as we start to neglect and even fight it, we only fight ourselves.

Maybe, just springing up, the (he-)story about 'God cursing' the snake by letting her 'crawl on the ground' is more an alliteration for the rise of patriarchy. But when this 'serpent inside' is the allegory for knowledge and wisdom - we might think well what we do to ourselves, to mankind, to all our environment, and in the end - whom we then serve, then.

Yearly and to remind was celebrated as a holy ritual the re-connection, the '(w)holy marriage' of the both.The connection of Male and Female as equal players. Look it up if you like so, and don't get lost in pictures others have implanted for their own purpose.

Sarpanit most likely a 'mother goddess' and at the same time, creatress of seeds, 'Earth' is mother goddess in many ways .. and people always have understood that we depend on its fruit and being nurtured by it, the other way around, caring for it and all that is 'her' children, too.

Similar the 'Eve Concept', who realized she delivered (the awakening of human consciousness about creatorship ... ) and felt just joy about it.

Later, this act of awakening was torn around and was loaded with 'guilt' and 'sin' ... which is sheer nonsense, as this was interpreted this way by only old men who must have lost all contacts with their roots including being healthily male. A healthy male would not hit at a woman for the fact that she delivers but understand that he is strong for protecting and taking care.

Getting back to Freud, the 'godfather' (sinfather would fit better) of psychology, drug-headed and directed by his very own fears and brainwashed child of a society at that time, his idea of 'penis-envy' might much more refer to a common state of disconnection of females, especially of that time, to connect with the inner serpent, the inner wisdom and healer, the knowledge about nurturing and developing seeds. As still, modern society's concept of psychology follows the basic principles set up by this guy or his disciples, what really is female is still neglected and rejected. Thus it is no wonder that still, people all over the world with a few exceptions, are caught up in that useless fight - against themselves.

Whether a religious dogma comes along in the cloth of religion or the religion is named 'science' does not matter in the end. In the end what matters is what fruit they bear.


Therefore, to remain fair - any 'religion' who devalues what is 'female' is no better at All. 

 

And what is most important: those females who devalue female are the worst of all.



Plus: As all men have an 'X'-chromosome they do not harm the seemingly 'other' with it - they harm themselves. How intelligent!

And if I look at India or China which outwardly have either no or many religions, all those probs in society are quite related to devaluing women. The beasts you may get as women who also want to survive and get no open way is a proper rebound.


Christianity has had their dark times and we all know this. They wanted to keep people stupid for reasons of power and therefore extracted all knowledge and all who carried knowledge and wisdom for the sake of the people. Same as is now happening as a backlash. When I lived in middle-east, I have learned a lot about ancient high-civilizations and really huge 'kingdoms' which were ruled to the best of the population. If we analyze a lot of scriptures well and with an open and not pre-occupied view, we might find that many texts and passages refer much more to a state of mind rather than local or historic events.

It's states of minds which bring forth materialization on this planet. 

What ever is visualized is sooner or later taking place.

And we can use this in both ways - forward, or backward in time and development.



And to find the loop to today:

What state of mind is it when by now a complete generation is - not by religion this time but it can become one - only skilled in two-dimensional, short-term-oriented and quick re- and action?


Oops.


Just my thoughts of today.

Looks like very dreadful downsizing of abilities. At least to me.
As I know it is we who have it in our hands.

Have a great day then,
Yours,

Lyn


PS. no pic for today. I didn't find any useful one of Sarpanit.

No comments:

Post a Comment